The health of honey bee populations underpins both global agriculture and ecological resilience. Among the many threats facing bees, the parasitic mite Varroa destructor has become a particular focus of international concern. This tiny yet devastating pest weakens colonies, transmits viruses, and contributes to significant losses in managed bee populations worldwide.
The recent arrival of Varroa destructor in Australia, a country that had previously remained free of the mite, has underscored the urgent need for effective detection and biosecurity measures. Timely identification of infestations is critical for protecting both agricultural productivity and biodiversity. In this context, a promising innovation is emerging: the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for monitoring V. destructor.
This article shares recent research that investigates the application of eDNA methods for detecting Varroa destructor within honey bee hives, offering a complementary approach to traditional techniques. The findings suggest that eDNA-based detection could enhance surveillance, support early interventions, and contribute to safeguarding pollinator health globally.
Why Early Detection Matters
Honey bees play an essential role as pollinators of both crops and wild plants. Their decline poses risks not just to agricultural yields, but to the integrity of ecosystems more broadly. The spread of Varroa destructor has exacerbated this challenge. By feeding on bees and facilitating the transmission of pathogens, the mite undermines colony health, disrupts pollination services, and amplifies the vulnerability of already stressed bee populations.
Traditional methods for detecting V. destructor, such as alcohol washes, are widely used by beekeepers but involve handling bees directly, which can disturb colonies and require considerable effort and expertise. These approaches are reliable but not ideally suited for frequent, large-scale surveillance, particularly when rapid response is needed.
Environmental DNA: A New Approach
Environmental DNA refers to genetic material that organisms shed into their surroundings, through skin, saliva, faeces or, in this case, hive debris and honey. By sampling and analysing this DNA, researchers can detect species without needing to observe or capture them directly.
eDNA methods offer several distinct advantages. They are non-invasive, reducing the need to handle bees and disrupt colonies. The techniques are also highly sensitive, capable of detecting low levels of pest DNA that might indicate an incipient infestation. Moreover, eDNA sampling is scalable, as it can be employed across multiple sites relatively quickly and without the need for extensive specialist training, making it attractive to both beekeepers and biosecurity authorities.
Developing the Molecular Assay
At the heart of this study was the development of a species-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay, designed to target the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (cox1) gene of Varroa destructor. This gene provides a unique signature, enabling precise identification of mite DNA even amidst the complex biological material present in a hive.
To ensure reliability, the assay was rigorously tested against DNA from closely related mite species and honey bee hosts. This step was essential for confirming specificity and avoiding false positives. Optimisation of the assay parameters included careful calibration of primer and probe concentrations to maximise sensitivity.
All assays were performed using a modern real-time PCR platform, ensuring robust and reproducible detection.
Sampling Inside the Hive
The research deployed a sampling strategy designed to capture eDNA from multiple sources within honey bee colonies. Honey, in particular, was recognised as a valuable substrate. Collected from capped combs using sterile techniques, honey provides a medium where mite DNA can accumulate over time, effectively recording the history of infestation.
Swabs were taken from hive entrances and brood frames, targeting surfaces where mites or their traces might be deposited by foraging and nursing bees. To ensure accuracy, negative control samples were collected at each sampling site to monitor for contamination.
Comparing eDNA with Traditional Techniques
To evaluate the effectiveness of eDNA detection, the researchers compared their findings with those obtained through the alcohol wash method. In this conventional approach, around 300 adult bees are immersed in ethanol, dislodging mites for counting. While robust, this method is inherently invasive and labour-intensive.
Statistical analyses, including McNemar’s Chi-square test, were used to assess the agreement between the two approaches, providing a quantitative measure of eDNA’s performance relative to established practice.
Key Findings
The study revealed that eDNA methods can offer a highly sensitive means of detecting Varroa destructor. Among the different sample types, honey consistently yielded the highest detection rates, with sensitivity measured at 91%. This outperformed swabs from hive entrances and brood frames, whose sensitivities were considerably lower.
Importantly, the number of mite DNA copies detected in honey samples increased with infestation levels, suggesting that eDNA quantification could offer insights not only into presence or absence, but also into the scale of infestation. Such information is valuable for beekeepers aiming to tailor interventions appropriately.
However, the study also noted limitations. Detection rates declined at very low infestation levels (below 1%), indicating that eDNA sensitivity is diminished when mite populations are just beginning to establish. This finding highlights the need for further optimisation, especially if eDNA is to be deployed as an early warning system.
The results highlighted that while swabs from hive entrances and brood frames provided valid supplementary data, they lacked the consistency shown by honey samples. A combined approach, drawing on both honey sampling and surface swabbing, may prove to be the most effective.
Implications for Biosecurity and Beekeeping
The potential applications of eDNA techniques in biosecurity surveillance are significant. Their non-invasive nature reduces stress on bee colonies. At the same time, their scalability allows for broader monitoring coverage—qualities that are particularly valuable when surveillance needs to be expanded rapidly, such as during an incursion into previously mite-free regions.
By complementing, rather than replacing, traditional methods, eDNA detection can enhance the overall surveillance toolkit available to beekeepers and regulators. Alcohol washes will remain important for estimating infestation intensity within colonies, but eDNA provides an additional, sensitive means for early detection.
For Australia and other regions still striving to keep Varroa destructor at bay, eDNA offers a means of detecting incursions promptly, buying time for containment and eradication efforts before the mite becomes established.
Looking Ahead
This research opens the door to further exploration of how eDNA methods can contribute to supporting pollinator health. Collaboration will be key: researchers, beekeepers, biosecurity authorities and policymakers will need to work together to ensure that eDNA tools are developed, validated and deployed effectively. Future work could focus on improving sampling protocols, investigating the persistence of mite DNA in hive environments, and extending the approach to monitor other pests and pathogens relevant to honey bee health.
Pollinator health is under increasing pressure. Innovations such as these represent not just technical progress but a vital contribution to securing the future of both food production and ecological stability.
Leave a Reply